The two theoretical approaches that I am going to compare and contrast are: The Structural Functionalist orientation and Conflict orientation.

The Structural functionalist is the theory that states all aspects of a society are dependent and they serve a function. Basically each member in the society has a role to play in order for it to be stable and to make sure it functions. It is a system of interrelated parts in a dynamic equilibrium. Social stability is necessary for a strong society and adequate socialisation and social integration. Conflict Orientation is mainly about the class conflict in a society due to unequal distribution resources. Society in conflict orientation is characterised by inequality based on social class, race, gender and other factors.

The main difference between the structural functionalist and conflict is the approach used in structural functionalism is that all elements of the society are interdependent and they serve on a function for all the overall stability and functioning of the society. On the other side conflict orientation is more about social inequality in the division of resources and that basically means the conflict between classes will eventual trigger social change.